Changes To Review Submittals, Everybody please read Options

[Gold Miner in Red]

Should have known this 3 location thing prior to filling out the crap and hitting the post button. Screw this site. I am gone.

[dalsgal]

Love how people read the rules and agree to them and then get angry after they post.

[gritz]

This is pretty lame when you refuse to post reviews that really help other RVers find a decent site. We may not DO 3 reviews in a year but if I am willing to take the time to submit a review and you won't even consider it .... then I'll never be back. I'll find another RV review site that is relevant and I will suggest to each park we visit that they use it. Why would I waste time doing a review where it's not appreciated. Dumb ... plain dumb.

[dalsgal]

For you that don't want to help others I will say that there is a reason for the 3 posts (not 3 in a year) and that is to keep dishonest owners or grumpy campers from signing on to make fake posts.

[kcmoedoe]

Should have known this 3 location thing prior to filling out the crap and hitting the post button. Screw this site. I am gone.

Bet he is now just as happy about this site as he was about the park he was preparing to skewer. Don't really see reviewing three parks as a major problem. It is, after all, a Campground and RV park review site. Camping and RVing tends to imply that you are going places and seeing things. Not sitting in one place for a year. And, it sure appears that single posts do make it the site eventually. Seems like whenever I see a terrible review, the reviewer has no other reviews. Apparently it can and does happen.

This is pretty lame when you refuse to post reviews that really help other RVers find a decent site. We may not DO 3 reviews in a year but if I am willing to take the time to submit a review and you won't even consider it .... then I'll never be back. I'll find another RV review site that is relevant and I will suggest to each park we visit that they use it. Why would I waste time doing a review where it's not appreciated. Dumb ... plain dumb.

So you visit enough parks that you recommending another review site (that actually doesn't exist as far as I have seen) will make a difference, yet you cannot review all those parks, just this single one, that I am sure you want to vent your frustrations at. Other than the entertainment value, most of the users of this site want information on both GOOD and bad parks. Only reviewing ones that you felt were bad doesn't help most of us. We are looking for GOOD places to stay and if you won't take the time to tell us where those parks are, we probably don't need you to come back.

[Denali]

Should have known this 3 location thing prior to filling out the crap and hitting the post button. Screw this site. I am gone.

Wow, that will bring the site to it's knees!

Only 172,706 other reviews are online at this site, so expect to see a big impact from Gold Miner in Red's departure!

[Glenn Norton]

Should have known this 3 location thing prior to filling out the crap and hitting the post button. Screw this site. I am gone.

If "crap" is all you have in your review, I don't need to read it.

[Texasrvers]

it sure appears that single posts do make it the site eventually.

Let me explain how this can happen. Sometimes a new reviewer submits their 3 required reviews which meets our criteria. However, if two of those reviews must be deferred that leaves only one review posted. Thus, it appears that he has submitted only one review when in fact, he really did submit 3.


By the way. we will gladly return Gold Miners' and gritz's membership fee if they will fill out the crap paperwork to request a refund.

[HappiestCamper]

kcmoedoe, as usual you knocked it out off the park.

Texasrvers, love the part about the refund

[HercMaster]

Changing the subject a bit, I noticed today a review submitted by another user that clearly is referencing the wrong campground. The user has submitted only 2 reviews, and those 2 look legit, but I can tell the user is referencing the wrong campground (because I visited that campground just an hour ago, and because I am currently camping IN the campground the user *meant* to reference.

The review given is only a 5-star review ( which in my opinion is pretty much about the right rating for the campground I am in, and which is clearly the campground he *meant* to submit on ) and it is unfortunate because the campground he actually named is nearby and is more on the order of 8 stars, based on my impression when I visited THAT campground an hour ago and also based on other user's reviews of that campground which are posted here.

If a moderator would like to contact me by private email, I will be glad to give him the names of the 2 campgrounds I am talking about, along with supporting data as to why I am sure the other user made an error in referencing those 2 campgrounds. It would be good, for the sake of BOTH of the 2 campgrounds, to correct the incorrect campsite reference.

[Texasrvers]

If a moderator would like to contact me by private email, I will be glad to give him the names of the 2 campgrounds I am talking about, along with supporting data as to why I am sure the other user made an error in referencing those 2 campgrounds. It would be good, for the sake of BOTH of the 2 campgrounds, to correct the incorrect campsite reference.

Since you have now located how to send a message directly to me, please go ahead and send the names of the 2 campgrounds and any other data about them to me, and I will have a look at them. Thanks for pointing this out.

Texasrvers

[Fitzjohnfan]

Let me explain how this can happen. Sometimes a new reviewer submits their 3 required reviews which meets our criteria. However, if two of those reviews must be deferred that leaves only one review posted. Thus, it appears that he has submitted only one review when in fact, he really did submit 3.
By the way. we will gladly return Gold Miners' and gritz's membership fee if they will fill out the crap paperwork to request a refund.

Texas, this comment made me laugh so hard I woke my wife up sleeping next to me. Because of this I too want a refund, and I will no longer post any more reviews (for the next 24 hours). (Grin).

[Texasrvers]

Texas, this comment made me laugh so hard I woke my wife up sleeping next to me. Because of this I too want a refund, and I will no longer post any more reviews (for the next 24 hours). (Grin).

OK, since you requested so politely I will not make you fill out the paperwork. Watch for your membership refund check in the mail.

[Joe56]

The problem with even 3 is some of us are seasonal campers like me I stay at on site fore the season. With that said I know I'm new here but wanted people to know about the tv park I stay at and their unposted changes.