 Reviewer ratings, A bit more care please. |
| Reviewer ratings, A bit more care please. |
| harrym55 |
 Aug 18 2004, 11:08 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Newbie  Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 10-August 04 Member No.: 1225  |
Seems to me folks are much too ready to say "9" or "10."
When I see one of these ratings, I immediately expect a park on a par with Ft. Wilderness, Topsail Hill, and other full service, attractively landscaped parks. All too often, I have relied on the ratings here when visiting a new park, only to discover that a perfect "10" is really a "6" or "7". So, when you rate somewhere, remember the rest of us will be comparing that park to all the others we have visited. Kind of like my favorite restaurant - it's a ten to me, but I sure wouldn't tell a visitor that it's one of the best in the world. |
   |
 
|
  |
| 96dutchmen |
Aug 21 2004, 11:37 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 6-August 04 Member No.: 1185 |
When I'm considering a campground, I read Woodall's and AAA, Google for any comments, and (now that I know about this great site) read the comments here. The numeric ratings are just one thing I think about. I agree that we need to put enough detail in our comments so that everyone else can get an idea of what we mean when we say a particular campground is a "10" or a "1".
|
|
|
|
harrym55 Reviewer ratings Aug 18 2004, 11:08 PM
BBear I think it would be beneficial for posters to expl... Aug 19 2004, 12:55 AM partyof5 I agree with BBear. A park that is a 10 to me, ma... Aug 19 2004, 07:31 AM 58KCb No question, Topsail Hill is a #10.........so is G... Aug 19 2004, 11:48 AM Sunflyer We take the high ratings into account with the com... Aug 19 2004, 03:02 PM John Blue I do not think you will find a lot of 10 parks aro... Aug 19 2004, 08:44 PM RVman3252 I feel this board is just 1 more tool to try to at... Aug 21 2004, 10:56 AM |
