Pictures In Reviews Options

[dodge guy]

So I don`t know if this has come up before, but as I read some of the reviews here and when I check out the pics of campgrounds people have been too, I see how nice it is to put a place with a name. So, has it ever come up about being able to put a pic or 2 in a review for or against the reason to saty at a particular campground? maybe bad hookups, poorly laid out park (tight turns), maybe a very clean bathhouse or a very nice pool area, or any other obvious reason! I realise it would make the posting process a little more time consuming, but I think it would be a very helpful tool! just a thought while I`m sitting here checking out reviews and trying to picture what some people are explaining. otherwise this is a great site, keep up the good work!

[rvmamabel]

I love the idea of photos, as I prefer wooded sites with space between campers. I always appreciate it when reviewers include the topography of the CG in their review, although this is something I often forget to include myself. Before getting into RV'ing, I used trip advisor to review hotels, and like how folks would include their photos. I didn't feel that their photos misrepresented what I encountered on my visit. I would pay an annual membership fee to have acess t photos on this website...maybe their could be the 'free' level that is open to all, but a small annual fee would provide access to photos or other additional features. Thoughts?

[Meyer Camping]

I love the idea of photos, as I prefer wooded sites with space between campers. I always appreciate it when reviewers include the topography of the CG in their review, although this is something I often forget to include myself. Before getting into RV'ing, I used trip advisor to review hotels, and like how folks would include their photos. I didn't feel that their photos misrepresented what I encountered on my visit. I would pay an annual membership fee to have acess t photos on this website...maybe their could be the 'free' level that is open to all, but a small annual fee would provide access to photos or other additional features. Thoughts?

I would be interested in a pay version that would include photos. Perhaps $20 per year in my mind would be acceptable. I am truly amazed at what an excellent resource this site is, considering that it is free.