RV Park Reviews

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Review Not Posted, I've read the rules ......
gritz
post Sep 25 2012, 04:10 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Moderated
Posts: 3
Joined: 18-September 12
Member No.: 74550



I posted a review that was accepted on 9/17/2012 on Farewell Bend. (Huntington) but never published or posted to this review site. Since I included a lot of detail for accuracy in case an RVer' was looking for a site that could pickup up Verizon cell phone service, which means Internet with a smartphone, I was disappointed when the review was not published. In further checking, it seems that a lot of reviews are painfully old so I suspect you won't get much current information, at least in Farewell Bend. But in case you need the Internet, site #112 can do it, with a booster. My SS was actually -59 dBm ... which is a good as it gets.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Jerry S
post Apr 28 2013, 10:10 PM
Post #2


Advanced Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 432
Joined: 9-January 07
From: Chicago
Member No.: 10441



Back to the part of this thread that discussed the need to moderate the incoming reviews. I recently read a review of the Ameristar Vickburg (MS) RV Park. Except for calling the park "rundown" and not getting a 50Amp site until they threatened to leave, the reviewer said little about the RV park. In fact, they actually wrote "I guess my rating is based not so much on the park as on Vicksburg itself". That's just wrong.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
docj
post Apr 29 2013, 12:20 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 940
Joined: 4-July 10
Member No.: 45503



QUOTE(Jerry S. @ Apr 29 2013, 12:10 AM) *

Back to the part of this thread that discussed the need to moderate the incoming reviews. I recently read a review of the Ameristar Vickburg (MS) RV Park. Except for calling the park "rundown" and not getting a 50Amp site until they threatened to leave, the reviewer said little about the RV park. In fact, they actually wrote "I guess my rating is based not so much on the park as on Vicksburg itself". That's just wrong.


I agree that the review you have cited should not have been posted as written. I know that this website uses volunteer reviewers who do their best to ensure that posted reviews adhere to site standards. However, as is the case with any activity involving multiple individuals exercising subjective evaluations, no two reviewers have exactly the same standards for acceptable review content.

I'm sure that your post pointing out the deficiencies of this review will result in it being re-evaluated and, most likely, being revised. IMHO bringing your concerns to the attention of the administrative team was very appropriate.


--------------------
Joel Weiss
2000 Beaver Patriot Thunder--Cat C12
2014 Honda CR-V EX-L toad
WiFi Ranger Ambassador
RVParkReviews.com Administrator
Share our adventures at: Weiss Travels
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
gritz   Review Not Posted   Sep 25 2012, 04:10 PM
Texasrvers   I found a review for Farewell Bend that was submit...   Sep 25 2012, 06:17 PM
gritz   I found a review for Farewell Bend that was submi...   Oct 22 2012, 09:06 AM
Denali   ...If I can't see my post online and re-edit i...   Oct 22 2012, 09:29 AM
docj   I guess I'm not understanding the value of de...   Oct 22 2012, 11:32 AM
rkw99   I think this policy stems from the fact that ther...   Oct 22 2012, 01:03 PM
rvingup   I thought I read a month ago, it was submit 2 revi...   Oct 21 2012, 11:52 PM
Texasrvers   It is 3.   Oct 22 2012, 12:30 AM
weighit   Another case of the rules don't apply to me. I...   Oct 22 2012, 11:12 PM
dog bone   If I can't see my post online and re-edit if n...   Oct 24 2012, 12:46 PM
RanMan   [b]I don't know why this is typing in bold p...   Oct 25 2012, 10:14 AM
fistymc   I understand the reasons for moderating posts, but...   Dec 26 2012, 04:27 PM
Texasrvers   I understand the reasons for moderating posts, bu...   Dec 26 2012, 08:27 PM
rkw99   I understand the reasons for moderating posts, bu...   Dec 28 2012, 01:57 PM
Texasrvers   Yet another example of inconsistency with followi...   Dec 28 2012, 04:35 PM
pianotuna   Hi, The admins are all volunteers and this is a f...   Dec 29 2012, 07:23 AM
FosterImposters   The wonder is that there are so many excellent r...   Dec 29 2012, 10:58 AM
cKarlGo   Have lost track of the number of years we have us...   Jan 10 2013, 08:13 PM
wprigge   Right on pianotuna! :)   Dec 29 2012, 09:29 AM
mdcamping   Right on pianotuna! :) X2 Mike   Dec 29 2012, 09:51 AM
Emma   X2 Mike X2 (for the "Right on pianotuna...   Apr 6 2013, 07:29 AM
joez   This site is really our only source to find a pl...   Jan 10 2013, 08:46 PM
RLM   I do a couple of small commercial websites and bus...   Jan 11 2013, 11:26 AM
jimnkaran   I am new to this website but really like any site ...   Apr 5 2013, 08:37 PM
DXSMac   Um..... I think you can't post on a campground...   Apr 10 2013, 08:25 AM
jimnkaran   Um..... I think you can't post on a campgroun...   Apr 10 2013, 10:13 AM
docj   FWIW, I never noticed that the "affirmation...   Apr 5 2013, 08:49 PM
Texasrvers   I will try to get a clarification from the webmast...   Apr 10 2013, 11:03 AM
Texasrvers   I think you will now find that this statement has ...   Apr 11 2013, 11:25 AM
Jerry S.   Back to the part of this thread that discussed the...   Apr 28 2013, 10:10 PM
docj   Back to the part of this thread that discussed th...   Apr 29 2013, 12:20 AM
jamarynn1   Speaking of odd reasons to downgrade a park, I was...   Apr 29 2013, 12:16 PM
Fitzjohnfan   Speaking of odd reasons to downgrade a park, I wa...   Apr 29 2013, 01:40 PM
HappiestCamper   I read that review also, and scratched my head as...   Apr 30 2013, 06:58 AM
RLM   This one got discussed a lot at rv.net, and it wa...   Apr 30 2013, 08:13 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version
RVParkReviews.com