RV Park Reviews

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

26 Pages V « < 21 22 23 24 25 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Changes To Review Submittals, Everybody please read
Gold Miner in Red
post Oct 18 2012, 01:15 PM
Post #331


Newbie
*

Group: Moderated
Posts: 1
Joined: 18-October 12
Member No.: 75324



Should have known this 3 location thing prior to filling out the crap and hitting the post button. Screw this site. I am gone.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dalsgal
post Oct 18 2012, 02:22 PM
Post #332


Advanced Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 355
Joined: 2-July 07
From: Texas
Member No.: 14080



Love how people read the rules and agree to them and then get angry after they post.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gritz
post Oct 18 2012, 02:46 PM
Post #333


Newbie
*

Group: Moderated
Posts: 3
Joined: 18-September 12
Member No.: 74550



This is pretty lame when you refuse to post reviews that really help other RVers find a decent site. We may not DO 3 reviews in a year but if I am willing to take the time to submit a review and you won't even consider it .... then I'll never be back. I'll find another RV review site that is relevant and I will suggest to each park we visit that they use it. Why would I waste time doing a review where it's not appreciated. Dumb ... plain dumb.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dalsgal
post Oct 18 2012, 02:53 PM
Post #334


Advanced Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 355
Joined: 2-July 07
From: Texas
Member No.: 14080



For you that don't want to help others I will say that there is a reason for the 3 posts (not 3 in a year) and that is to keep dishonest owners or grumpy campers from signing on to make fake posts.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kcmoedoe
post Oct 18 2012, 03:43 PM
Post #335


Advanced Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 292
Joined: 22-May 08
Member No.: 21445



QUOTE(Gold Miner in Red @ Oct 18 2012, 01:15 PM) *

Should have known this 3 location thing prior to filling out the crap and hitting the post button. Screw this site. I am gone.

Bet he is now just as happy about this site as he was about the park he was preparing to skewer. Don't really see reviewing three parks as a major problem. It is, after all, a Campground and RV park review site. Camping and RVing tends to imply that you are going places and seeing things. Not sitting in one place for a year. And, it sure appears that single posts do make it the site eventually. Seems like whenever I see a terrible review, the reviewer has no other reviews. Apparently it can and does happen.

QUOTE(gritz @ Oct 18 2012, 02:46 PM) *

This is pretty lame when you refuse to post reviews that really help other RVers find a decent site. We may not DO 3 reviews in a year but if I am willing to take the time to submit a review and you won't even consider it .... then I'll never be back. I'll find another RV review site that is relevant and I will suggest to each park we visit that they use it. Why would I waste time doing a review where it's not appreciated. Dumb ... plain dumb.

So you visit enough parks that you recommending another review site (that actually doesn't exist as far as I have seen) will make a difference, yet you cannot review all those parks, just this single one, that I am sure you want to vent your frustrations at. Other than the entertainment value, most of the users of this site want information on both GOOD and bad parks. Only reviewing ones that you felt were bad doesn't help most of us. We are looking for GOOD places to stay and if you won't take the time to tell us where those parks are, we probably don't need you to come back.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Denali
post Oct 18 2012, 05:08 PM
Post #336


Advanced Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1013
Joined: 11-January 05
From: Fulltime traveler
Member No.: 2163



QUOTE(Gold Miner in Red @ Oct 18 2012, 12:15 PM) *

Should have known this 3 location thing prior to filling out the crap and hitting the post button. Screw this site. I am gone.
Wow, that will bring the site to it's knees!

Only 172,706 other reviews are online at this site, so expect to see a big impact from Gold Miner in Red's departure!


--------------------
Dave Rudisill
Fulltimer since 2002
2004 Beaver Monterey
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Glenn Norton
post Oct 18 2012, 05:39 PM
Post #337


Advanced Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 739
Joined: 19-June 06
From: Penticton BC Canada
Member No.: 6876



QUOTE(Gold Miner in Red @ Oct 18 2012, 12:15 PM) *

Should have known this 3 location thing prior to filling out the crap and hitting the post button. Screw this site. I am gone.


If "crap" is all you have in your review, I don't need to read it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Texasrvers
post Oct 18 2012, 10:40 PM
Post #338


Advanced Member
******

Group: Admin
Posts: 3525
Joined: 6-March 06
Member No.: 5452



QUOTE(kcmoedoe @ Oct 18 2012, 04:43 PM) *

it sure appears that single posts do make it the site eventually.


Let me explain how this can happen. Sometimes a new reviewer submits their 3 required reviews which meets our criteria. However, if two of those reviews must be deferred that leaves only one review posted. Thus, it appears that he has submitted only one review when in fact, he really did submit 3.


By the way. we will gladly return Gold Miners' and gritz's membership fee if they will fill out the crap paperwork to request a refund.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
HappiestCamper
post Oct 19 2012, 06:23 AM
Post #339


Advanced Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 343
Joined: 9-August 07
From: Mount Pleasant, SC
Member No.: 15651



kcmoedoe, as usual you knocked it out off the park.

Texasrvers, love the part about the refund biggrin.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
HercMaster
post Nov 7 2012, 03:10 PM
Post #340


Newbie
*

Group: Moderated
Posts: 3
Joined: 6-September 11
Member No.: 62914



Changing the subject a bit, I noticed today a review submitted by another user that clearly is referencing the wrong campground. The user has submitted only 2 reviews, and those 2 look legit, but I can tell the user is referencing the wrong campground (because I visited that campground just an hour ago, and because I am currently camping IN the campground the user *meant* to reference.

The review given is only a 5-star review ( which in my opinion is pretty much about the right rating for the campground I am in, and which is clearly the campground he *meant* to submit on ) and it is unfortunate because the campground he actually named is nearby and is more on the order of 8 stars, based on my impression when I visited THAT campground an hour ago and also based on other user's reviews of that campground which are posted here.

If a moderator would like to contact me by private email, I will be glad to give him the names of the 2 campgrounds I am talking about, along with supporting data as to why I am sure the other user made an error in referencing those 2 campgrounds. It would be good, for the sake of BOTH of the 2 campgrounds, to correct the incorrect campsite reference.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Texasrvers
post Nov 7 2012, 04:04 PM
Post #341


Advanced Member
******

Group: Admin
Posts: 3525
Joined: 6-March 06
Member No.: 5452



QUOTE(HercMaster @ Nov 7 2012, 03:10 PM) *

If a moderator would like to contact me by private email, I will be glad to give him the names of the 2 campgrounds I am talking about, along with supporting data as to why I am sure the other user made an error in referencing those 2 campgrounds. It would be good, for the sake of BOTH of the 2 campgrounds, to correct the incorrect campsite reference.


Since you have now located how to send a message directly to me, please go ahead and send the names of the 2 campgrounds and any other data about them to me, and I will have a look at them. Thanks for pointing this out.

Texasrvers
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Fitzjohnfan
post Nov 24 2012, 01:23 AM
Post #342


Advanced Member
******

Group: Members
Posts: 170
Joined: 6-April 10
From: Westminster, Colorado
Member No.: 41655



QUOTE(Texasrvers @ Oct 18 2012, 09:40 PM) *

Let me explain how this can happen. Sometimes a new reviewer submits their 3 required reviews which meets our criteria. However, if two of those reviews must be deferred that leaves only one review posted. Thus, it appears that he has submitted only one review when in fact, he really did submit 3.
By the way. we will gladly return Gold Miners' and gritz's membership fee if they will fill out the crap paperwork to request a refund.

Texas, this comment made me laugh so hard I woke my wife up sleeping next to me. Because of this I too want a refund, and I will no longer post any more reviews (for the next 24 hours). (Grin).


--------------------
Chris G.
Westminster, CO
FMCA: F3508-S
1989 32' Southwind MH
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Texasrvers
post Nov 24 2012, 11:43 AM
Post #343


Advanced Member
******

Group: Admin
Posts: 3525
Joined: 6-March 06
Member No.: 5452



QUOTE(Fitzjohnfan @ Nov 24 2012, 01:23 AM) *

Texas, this comment made me laugh so hard I woke my wife up sleeping next to me. Because of this I too want a refund, and I will no longer post any more reviews (for the next 24 hours). (Grin).



OK, since you requested so politely I will not make you fill out the paperwork. Watch for your membership refund check in the mail. laugh.gif tongue.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Joe56
post May 27 2013, 07:16 PM
Post #344


Newbie
*

Group: Moderated
Posts: 1
Joined: 27-May 13
Member No.: 78990



The problem with even 3 is some of us are seasonal campers like me I stay at on site fore the season. With that said I know I'm new here but wanted people to know about the tv park I stay at and their unposted changes.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MATurner
post Jun 20 2013, 08:55 PM
Post #345


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 13-April 09
Member No.: 30270



I'm a bit dismayed by this whole situation. I've written and had placed in the forum many reviews of campgrounds and have NEVER been denied a review. I stayed in a campground for two nights and wrote what I felt was an accurate review of the campground speaking of the false advertising and the problems we encountered at the campground. We are on a 3 month trip and have more than 30 reservations made for this trip. I cannot for the life of me figure out why my review was "deferred" except that I gave said campground a low rating compared to others who had reviewed it. I also mentioned a few positives. The only one being that they had spacious sites. If the campground advertises certain things and doesn't deliver, we should be able to advise fellow travelers so they won't have the same problem. I just cannot figure out what was wrong with my review.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

26 Pages V « < 21 22 23 24 25 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version
RVParkReviews.com